Re: failover issue?

Posted by Bob Harold on
URL: http://isc-dhcp-users.193.s1.nabble.com/failover-issue-tp24p28.html

I have found that the "peer holds all free leases" is a catch-all that can also mean "it did not match the allow members of ... or some other restriction on the dhcp range".



--
Bob Harold
hostmaster, UMnet, ITcom
Information and Technology Services (ITS)
[hidden email]
734-647-6524 desk

On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 6:52 AM, Christian Bösch <[hidden email]> wrote:
Hi,

I have a pair of failover dhcp servers (4.2.4) which work fine for a long time.
Now I added some subnets (same config like the old working one) and in that
subnets I get on both servers:

Apr  2 12:44:52 dns1 dhcpd: DHCPDISCOVER from 3c:97:0e:b8:6d:40 via 172.21.166.1: peer holds all free leases
Apr  2 12:44:52 dns1 dhcpd: DHCPDISCOVER from 3c:97:0e:b8:6d:40 via 172.21.166.1: peer holds all free leases
Apr  2 12:44:56 dns1 dhcpd: DHCPDISCOVER from 3c:97:0e:b8:6d:40 via 172.21.166.1: peer holds all free leases
Apr  2 12:44:56 dns1 dhcpd: DHCPDISCOVER from 3c:97:0e:b8:6d:40 via 172.21.166.1: peer holds all free leases


Apr  2 12:44:52 dns2 dhcpd: DHCPDISCOVER from 3c:97:0e:b8:6d:40 via 172.21.166.1: peer holds all free leases
Apr  2 12:44:52 dns2 dhcpd: DHCPDISCOVER from 3c:97:0e:b8:6d:40 via 172.21.166.1: peer holds all free leases
Apr  2 12:44:56 dns2 dhcpd: DHCPDISCOVER from 3c:97:0e:b8:6d:40 via 172.21.166.1: peer holds all free leases
Apr  2 12:44:56 dns2 dhcpd: DHCPDISCOVER from 3c:97:0e:b8:6d:40 via 172.21.166.1: peer holds all free leases

But the pool seems to be well balanced:

Apr  2 12:43:56 dns1 dhcpd: balancing pool 8019f8880 172.21.166.0/24  total 250  free 125  backup 125  lts 0  max-own (+/-)25
Apr  2 12:43:56 dns1 dhcpd: balanced pool 8019f8880 172.21.166.0/24  total 250  free 125  backup 125  lts 0  max-misbal 38

Apr  2 12:43:56 dns2 dhcpd: balancing pool 8019ef880 172.21.166.0/24  total 250  free 125  backup 125  lts 0  max-own (+/-)25
Apr  2 12:43:56 dns2 dhcpd: balanced pool 8019ef880 172.21.166.0/24  total 250  free 125  backup 125  lts 0  max-misbal 38

Does anyone have an idea what could be the reason for that?
Thanks,
Chris



_______________________________________________
dhcp-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcp-users


_______________________________________________
dhcp-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcp-users