Hi,
I need to assign two IPv6 addresses in my network - one
private/local-unique and one public to each requesting client. So far
I'm successful in assigning only one. There's a message from 2010 under
the subject "
How to config dhcpv6 server to assign multiple subnet address", and the
reply mentions that the 'shared network {}' clause should be used, and
two prefix-separated pool should be configured. I did that, but still my
clients (at least my FreeBSD with dhcp6c) receives only one address. So
I want to ask - who's opinion is valued the most, and who makes the
decision about multiple IPv6 addresses ? The client or the assigning
server ?
I'm using the isc-dhcpd 4.3.4 server and main part of my config looks like:
shared-network foobar {
limit-addrs-per-ia 2;
subnet6 fd00::500/120 {
range6 fd00::500/120;
option dhcp6.name-servers fd00::1;
}
subnet6 2a02:XXXX:40::500/120 {
range6 2a02:XXXX:40::500/120;
option dhcp6.name-servers fd00::1;
}
}
Thanks.
Eugene.
_______________________________________________
dhcp-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcp-users