I have:
dhcp-4.2.5-23.fc19.x86_64
dhcp-server-4.3.6-9.fc27.x86_64
running in a pair. Also:
dhcp-4.2.5-23.fc19.x86_64
dhcp-4.3.1-12.fc21.x86_64
in a pair.
Bill
On 4/12/2019 4:28 PM, Gregory Sloop
wrote:
Re: dhcpd 4.2.4 vs 4.3.5
I should
have added - I've read the release notes [mainly searching for
"peer"], and there's not much mentioned about changes in peer
communications or the peer underpinnings - so I'd *guess*
they'll talk fine - but having someone with some real knowledge
weigh in would be a lot more helpful in making me feel fairly
confident it will.
[I just don't want to turn off a 4.2.4 and bring up a 4.3.5 and
have it make a hash of things, so it's quite difficult to go
back to 4.2.4, and suddenly I don't have any working DHCP
servers!]
Again, thanks for any light someone might shed on this!
-Greg
|
This is mostly for ISC dev staff, [or anyone else
who might know]
Should failover peers running 4.2.4 talk to another peer
running 4.3.5 properly?
Or are there differences large enough between the two
versions to prevent them from working as a pair?
[Reason - I'm upgrading a pair of 4.2.4's to 4.3.5 - and
moving one of the pair to 4.3.5 and then the other also
to 4.3.5 seems like a very nice way to manage the
upgrade. But they'll have to work together well to do it
this way.]
-Greg |
_______________________________________________
dhcp-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcp-users
_______________________________________________
dhcp-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcp-users
Locked
