Different Failover Interfaces than DHCP interfaces

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
2 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Different Failover Interfaces than DHCP interfaces

iftech

Hello,

In the failover configuration can we use different IP address than the server IP address itself so that Failover traffic is out-of-band

Example: 

Both servers of a pair would have 10.0.0.1&10.0.0.2 as IP address for the real DHCP traffic interface

While in the failover config primary and secondary IP would be 10.1.1.1&10.1.1.2 for failover link to work on a dedicated interface ?

Thanks

yves


_______________________________________________
dhcp-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcp-users
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Different Failover Interfaces than DHCP interfaces

Simon Hobson
[hidden email] wrote:

> In the failover configuration can we use different IP address than the server IP address itself so that Failover traffic is out-of-band
>
> Example:
>
> Both servers of a pair would have 10.0.0.1&10.0.0.2 as IP address for the real DHCP traffic interface
>
> While in the failover config primary and secondary IP would be 10.1.1.1&10.1.1.2 for failover link to work on a dedicated interface ?

I don't use failover, but I believe that is supported.
One of the stated reasons for not automatically going into partner down state on losing contact with the peer is because there are networks where the servers may both be able to talk to clients, but not with each other - eg if they use a dedicated link or management network which has failed.

_______________________________________________
dhcp-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcp-users