DHCPv6 Failover

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
3 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

DHCPv6 Failover

Bouazouzi Maëlan (M.)

Hi,


Dhcpd6 with failover its possible?

I dont find documentation about this configuration...


Thanks.



Best Regards,

 

Maëlan BOUAZOUZI
DSI - RVD

Network Engineer

 



_______________________________________________
dhcp-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcp-users
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: DHCPv6 Failover

Shawn Routhier

On Jun 7, 2016, at 3:28 AM, Bouazouzi Maëlan (M.) <[hidden email]> wrote:

Hi,

Dhcpd6 with failover its possible?
I dont find documentation about this configuration...

Thanks.


Best Regards,
 
Maëlan BOUAZOUZI
DSI - RVD
Network Engineer
 


The IETF has not finished the v6 failover protocol draft.  It is currently
being worked on in the DHCP working group.  See 
for information about the WG and
for the protocol itself.

As v6 has a much larger address space you may also be
able to avoid using a failover set up by simply running multiple
DHCPv6 servers with non-overlapping address pools.  This
will provide redundant DHCPv6 service but will require that
client get new addresses if the server they originally got an
address from becomes unavailable.

regards,
Shawn


_______________________________________________
dhcp-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcp-users
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: DHCPv6 Failover

Bouazouzi Maëlan (M.)
Thanks you for your answer.


Regards,

 

Maëlan BOUAZOUZI
DSI - RVD




De: "Shawn Routhier" <[hidden email]>
À: "Users of ISC DHCP" <[hidden email]>
Envoyé: Mardi 7 Juin 2016 17:55:59
Objet: Re: DHCPv6 Failover


On Jun 7, 2016, at 3:28 AM, Bouazouzi Maëlan (M.) <[hidden email]> wrote:

Hi,

Dhcpd6 with failover its possible?
I dont find documentation about this configuration...

Thanks.


Best Regards,
 
Maëlan BOUAZOUZI
DSI - RVD
Network Engineer
 


The IETF has not finished the v6 failover protocol draft.  It is currently
being worked on in the DHCP working group.  See 
for information about the WG and
for the protocol itself.

As v6 has a much larger address space you may also be
able to avoid using a failover set up by simply running multiple
DHCPv6 servers with non-overlapping address pools.  This
will provide redundant DHCPv6 service but will require that
client get new addresses if the server they originally got an
address from becomes unavailable.

regards,
Shawn


_______________________________________________
dhcp-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcp-users


_______________________________________________
dhcp-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcp-users